Given the file lists, I am not sure alternatives are the best option. There are 9
manpages in `mutt-kz` and 7 in `mutt`, there are muttrc config files in both, but
Mutt has an extra file in there. There are several similarly named binaries as well.
If it's probably the better way to go, I can start writing alternatives.
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#issuecomment-206062166
I really doubt someone wants to install/use all mutt flavors at the same time.
`provides` and `replaces` are enough, imo. Other than that, LGTM.
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#issuecomment-207424404
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:07:29AM -0700, Alessio Sergi wrote:
> I really doubt someone wants to install/use all mutt flavors at the same time.
> `provides` and `replaces` are enough, imo. Other than that, LGTM.
>
> ---
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#issuecomment-207424404
Don't underestimate how much I love mutt and want to play with its flavors, but I agree. I doubt anyone actually wants to use multiple flavors at the same time. I suppose for that we can always use a VM.
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#issuecomment-207519665
Could be relevant on a multi-user system...
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#issuecomment-207550522
So what should the flavors be renamed? Where things need renaming that is.
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#issuecomment-207551978
Okay, going to go with provides and replaces. Should I bother with replaces or just provides?
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#issuecomment-207591352
This PR has been updated to have all the mutts using alternative groups. Should sysconfdir be changed, however? Might be cleaner to keep sysconfdir at `/etc` and pollute `/etc` with `Muttrc-$pkgname`
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#issuecomment-226400265
> post_install() {
> - rm ${DESTDIR}/etc/Muttrc.dist
> - rm ${DESTDIR}/etc/mime.types{,.dist}
> - rm ${DESTDIR}/usr/bin/{flea,muttbug}
> - rm ${DESTDIR}/usr/share/man/man1/{flea,muttbug}.1
> + # provided by mime-types
> + rm ${DESTDIR}/etc/${pkgname}/mime.types{,.dist}
> +
> + rm ${DESTDIR}/etc/${pkgname}/Muttrc.dist
> +
> vinstall contrib/gpg.rc 644 etc Muttrc.gpg.dist
Don't know if this should be `vconf` at all. I'm thinking `vsconf` is all that is necessary.
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981/files/a1a7282e4bc7bae4c52cba410b2428d1cf1c59e6#r67293878
Was merged.
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#issuecomment-231099713
Closed #3981.
---
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/voidlinux/void-packages/pull/3981#event-715816679